You must enable JavaScript to view this site.
This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our legal notice and privacy policy for more details.
Close
Homepage > Regions / Countries > Europe > Balkans > Albania > Pan-Albanianism: How Big a Threat to Balkan Stability?

Pan-Albanianism: How Big a Threat to Balkan Stability?

Europe Report N°153 25 Feb 2004

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Pan-Albanianism is seen by many observers as a serious threat to Balkan stability. A century of shifting borders has left ethnic Albanians scattered across Kosovo, Serbia, Montenegro, Macedonia and Greece. The Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), the National Liberation Army (NLA) in Macedonia, and other groups have all waged campaigns of violence in support of enhanced rights for ethnic Albanians. Where is the ceiling to their ambitions?

ICG’s research suggests that notions of pan-Albanianism are far more layered and complex than the usual broad brush characterisations of ethnic Albanians simply bent on achieving a greater Albania or a greater Kosovo. It is instructive that both the KLA and NLA started to gain popular support in Kosovo and Macedonia respectively at precisely the time when they moved away from their initial pan-Albanian nationalist goals and concentrated on more rights for their own people. The “Albanian National Army” (ANA) which overtly advocated a “Greater Albania” agenda, never managed to gain popular credibility. Violence in the cause of a greater Albania, or of any shift of borders, is neither politically popular nor morally justified.

In Albania since the arrival of multiparty politics, poverty and internal political conflict have eclipsed any aspirations towards expanding the state’s boundaries. Albania is more interested in developing cultural and economic ties with Kosovo, whilst maintaining separate statehood; and successive Albanian governments have opted for a strategic partnership with Macedonia as both aspire towards membership of NATO and the European Union.

There remains a risk of conflict in Kosovo, where the question of future status has not yet been resolved. The desire of the vast majority of Kosovo’s population for independence is supported by most Albanians elsewhere in the Balkans. However an independent Kosovo is quite a different matter from a Greater Albania. The international community’s problem is to manage the process of dealing with Kosovo’s final status without destabilising its neighbour.

In both Macedonia and the Presevo Valley of Southern Serbia, conflict was ended in 2001 by internationally brokered peace agreements, respectively the Ohrid Agreement and the Covic Plan. While there is dissatisfaction with the pace of implementation of these agreements, and with the delivery of promised reforms, this has not yet reached the point of crisis; the ANA’s attempts to capitalise on local discontents in Macedonia and Southern Serbia failed. Continued international attention will be necessary to ensure that all sides deliver on their promises. Montenegrin Albanians, on the other hand, have thus far resisted any form of paramilitary activity.

The large Kosovo Albanian diaspora communities living in the United States, Germany and Switzerland have played – and will continue to play – a key role in the current and future economic, social and political development of Kosovo, as well as dictating military events on the ground. They could easily open up new fronts if they wish to keep up the pressure on the numerous unresolved Albanian-related issues. For these reasons it would be advisable for the Albanian and Greek governments to try and settle the long-standing issue of the Chams displaced from Greece in 1945, before it gets hijacked and exploited by extreme nationalists, and the Chams’ legitimate grievances get lost in the struggle to further other national causes.

In the long term, Albanian nationalism will be tamed by full implementation of internationally-brokered agreements and respect for Albanians’ place in Macedonian, Serbian, and Montenegrin society, together with consistent pressure on Albanian extremists and politicians who appeal to them. The process will be assisted by European integration - as the borders open between Albania and its northern neighbours, and economic and educational opportunities increase across the region. Decentralising power in Macedonia, and giving Kosovo conditional independence in return for an assurance from all the Albanian entities in the Balkans that the present borders of south-eastern Europe will remain unchanged, would also help stabilise the situation.

RECOMMENDATIONS

To the Government of Albania:

1.  Continue efforts to neutralise paramilitary groups and extremist politicians by cracking down on all illegal arms trafficking and hoarding of weapons in Albania and maintaining cooperation on law-enforcement with neighbouring states and the European Union.

To UNMIK and KFOR:

2.  Intensify security efforts against organised crime and political militants, in particular by securing Kosovo’s borders more effectively.

3.  Prepare for a peaceful, legal and democratically rooted process of resolving Kosovo’s final status, including if necessary a bar on Kosovo uniting with Albania.

To the Government of Macedonia:

4.  Continue implementation of the Ohrid Agreement, including security sector reforms and decentralisation.

To the Government of Serbia:

5.  Reconstruct the Coordination Body for Southern Serbia.

6.  Rein in extremist elements in the security forces.

7.  Tighten customs controls along the Administrative Boundary with Kosovo, and crack down on organised crime.

To the Government of Montenegro:

8.  Assist with the establishment of an Albanian-language teacher training college in Tuzi or Ulcinj, in order to train future elementary and secondary school teachers.

To the Government of Greece:

9.  Take immediate measures to improve human rights for all Albanians resident in Greece.

10.  Open negotiations on the restoration of Cham property rights.

To Albanian Political Leaders throughout the Balkans:

11.  Speak out against extremist politicians and violent groups which seek to undermine the peace agreements of the last five years.

To the International Community, particularly the European Union and its Member States:

12.  Continue to insist on the implementation of the Ohrid Agreement and the Covic Plan.

13.  Put firmer pressure on and increase assistance to the Albanian and neighbouring governments to crack down firmly on illegal trade and smuggling.

14.  Facilitate the removal of obstacles to legal inter-Albanian trade.

15.  Ease the visa regime for residents of south-eastern Europe wanting to work in or visit the European Union.

16.  Give a positive response to Macedonia’s application for membership of the European Union, and encourage Albania’s aspirations to EU membership and both Albania’s and Macedonia’s aspirations to join NATO.

17.  Continue monitoring the activities of  Albanian extremists, and the politicians who aid them.

Tirana/Brussels, 25 February 2004

 
This page in:
English
Français
shqipe
srpski