Report 19 / Latin America & Caribbean

Venezuela: Hugo Chávez’s Revolution

After eight years in power, President Hugo Chávez won an overwhelming re-election in December 2006.

  • Share
  • Save
  • Print
  • Download PDF Full Report

Executive Summary

After eight years in power, President Hugo Chávez won an overwhelming re-election in December 2006. Flush with oil revenues, bolstered by high approval ratings and at the start of a six-year term, he expresses confidence about advancing what he calls his Bolivarian Revolution, named after Simón Bolívar, the country’s independence hero, and installing his still only vaguely defined “Socialism of the 21st Century”. There are concerns in Venezuela and much of the hemisphere, however, that to do so the ex-colonel and one-time coup leader may be willing to sacrifice democratic principles. He is not yet a dictator and for the most part has not tried to act in a dictatorial manner, but the trend toward autocracy is strong. If he continues to build personal power at the expense of other institutions and militarise much of the government and political life, there will be serious risks for internal conflict, especially if the oil boom that cushions the economy falters.

Crisis Group will examine subsequently what the Chávez phenomenon means for regional and hemispheric politics. This report concentrates on what has changed in the country’s institutional landscape, politics and economics. Chávez has been reconstructing Venezuela since his first election in 1998. A year after that success he pushed through a new constitution that dismantled the condominium of traditional parties that had dominated the country for most of two generations, replacing it with a “participatory” democracy founded on the notion of the president’s direct relationship with the people. The two-chamber Congress became a unicameral National Assembly, which, since the badly fragmented opposition unwisely boycotted the December 2005 legislative elections, has had only pro-Chávez members.

Traditional checks and balances on executive power have all but disappeared as key state institutions, such as the attorney general’s office, the Supreme Justice Tribunal, the electoral council and the armed forces, have progressively come under the control of the president and his loyalists, with military officers, active duty and reserve alike, filling many normally civilian offices. Large social service programs, termed “missions”, have been launched in poor neighbourhoods and helped gain popular support for the government. State control of the economy, not just the vital oil sector, has increased, as has pressure on opposition media and NGOs.

Polarisation in the body politic has reached historic proportions, with traditional elites and many among the middle class opposing these profound changes in a series of elections and in the streets. During his first five years of power, Chávez faced several attempts to unseat him, both constitutionally and unconstitutionally. In April 2002 and late 2003, he weathered first a coup then a prolonged national strike, while in August 2004 he emerged victorious from a recall referendum. Boosted by the referendum victory and high oil prices, he has been on the offensive ever since. In January 2007, the National Assembly passed with little debate an enabling law granting the president far-reaching legislative powers for eighteen months.

The political opposition is marginalised for now, as much by its own feuds as anything Chávez has done to restrict its ability to operate. Nevertheless, serious challenges are ahead. Excessive government spending has built up the debt, and inflation is the highest in the hemisphere. If oil prices fall further and production of the state-owned oil company, PDVSA, goes down, generous, ideologically-driven social programs will need to be cut. Discontent is rising over public sector corruption and skyrocketing crime and drug trafficking. Inflation-driven uncertainty is aggravated by the appearance of some food shortages in stores and markets.

The proliferation of armed groups also could become troublesome. Many Chavista groups, particularly in Caracas, have access to weapons, while additional government-established groups like the Frente Francisco Miranda, a civilian organisation made up of young people sent to Cuba for ideological training, are due to receive them. The National Reserve and Territorial Guard, created under Chávez, are outside the normal military chain of command, answerable directly to the president. There is concern that some of the armed groups could transform into criminal mafias. Chávez will also need to bridge widening fissures within his own camp about the direction in which his revolution should go.

Whether the social polarisation and accumulating tensions turn eventually into violence depends primarily on whether at a moment of triumph Chávez acts with restraint, in particular to:

  • limit use of the far-reaching powers granted him by the National Assembly so as to avoid further damage to institutional checks and balances, and respect Venezuela’s obligations under the Inter-American Democratic Charter, the American Convention of Human Rights and other international human rights treaties;
  • guarantee the full functioning of an attorney general, comptroller general and ombudsman independent of the executive, as designed in the 1999 constitution;
  • increase efforts to improve the medium to long-term sustainability of social and infrastructure programs by attacking inflation and fiscal deficits and avoiding excessive state control of the economy; and
  • halt the proliferation across the country of armed groups beyond control of the regular military and the professional police forces.

Bogotá/Brussels, 22 February 2007

Subscribe to Crisis Group’s Email Updates

Receive the best source of conflict analysis right in your inbox.