Report / Asia 3 minutes

缅甸转型过程中的黑暗面: 反穆斯林暴力事件

  • Share
  • 保存
  • 打印
  • Download PDF Full Report

执行摘要

继2012年若开邦族群之间爆发致命冲突之后,反穆斯林暴力事件已经蔓延到缅甸其他地区。由于缅甸国内对穆斯林积怨已深,安保力量又应对无力,意味着冲突有可能进一步扩大。除非政府做出有效反应,同时扭转社会上的态度,否则暴力可能会继续蔓延,影响缅甸的转型进程,并危及其在本地区以及国际上的地位。

暴力冲突发生的背景是,缅族佛教徒的民族主义情绪日益高涨,由僧侣发动的倡导不宽容和抵制穆斯林商业的“969”运动的影响力逐步扩大。这两个因素构成一个危险的组合:多年独裁统治下民众压抑已久的巨大挫败感和愤怒情绪,现在被一个披着宗教地位和道德权威外衣的民粹政治力量所引导,将矛头指向了穆斯林。

反印度和反穆斯林的暴力事件在缅甸屡见不鲜。这些问题的根源是该国的殖民历史和人口组成,以及在此背景下缅族民族主义的兴起。在随后的几十年里,致命的暴力事件在缅甸各地时有发生。然而,极权统治的废除和现代通信的普及,都意味着暴力蔓延的风险大大增加。

缅甸最受歧视的人口是若开邦北部地区的穆斯林罗兴亚人。他们中的大多数都被剥夺了公民权,在人身自由方面也受到严格限制,同时强加于他们的还有许多残暴严苛的政策。2012年6月和10月,若开邦的佛教徒和穆斯林之间爆发冲突,导致近200人死亡,约14万人流离失所,其中绝大多数为穆斯林。直到今天那里的族群之间实质上仍处于相互隔离状态,人道主义形势相当严峻。

2013年初,暴力活动蔓延至缅甸中部。最严重的事件发生在密铁拉市,某个店铺里发生的一起争端引发了反穆斯林暴力冲突:一名佛教僧侣被残酷杀害,导致局势迅速升级,多达1000名暴徒在持续两天的骚乱中给穆斯林社区带来了大范围的破坏,造成至少44人死亡,其中包括在某伊斯兰学校的一场屠杀中丧生的20名学生和几名老师。

警方的应对一直饱受缅甸国内以及国际舆论的诟病。若开邦的警察几乎全由若开佛教徒组成,据称他们无力制止针对穆斯林的袭击,有的还被指控参与了暴力活动。一旦部署了军队来实施行动,军队的表现会更好一些。密铁拉市的警察显然无力控制那些聚集在店铺外面的愤怒民众,当冲突迅速升级时,警察无可救药地陷入寡不敌众的境地,无法采取有效措施。

缅甸的暴力冲突对本地区也产生了影响。乘船离开若开邦,历经千辛万苦前往本地区其他国家的穆斯林人数一直在急剧增加,引发了其中一些国家公众的谴责之声。随着缅甸佛教徒在马来西亚被杀害、其他国家发生相关的暴力冲突,种族间的紧张局势也蔓延至缅甸边界之外。缅甸还一直受到圣战的威胁,一直以来也都还有针对缅甸或针对本地区佛教人物的阴谋和袭击。缅甸准备在2014年接手成为东南亚国家联盟(东盟)轮值主席国,暴力冲突可能会成为一个严重的政治问题。

缅甸政府明白这一问题利害攸关。吴登盛总统公开阐明了暴力的危害性,并宣布对暴力事件采取“零容忍”态度。警方的应对已有所改善,能够更快、更有效地采取干预措施,更迅速地控制暴力事件。尽管有所延迟,但犯下这些罪行的肇事者都被起诉和判刑,然而也存在这种担心,那就是对佛教徒的处理有时会较为宽大。

然而,还有更多的工作亟待处理。除了加强警察的防暴训练和升级其装备外,有必要对警察服务进行更广泛的改革,使包括来自少数民族和信仰少数派宗教等在内的警察的服务更高效,更取信于民,尤其是在族群层面。现在万事才刚刚开头。政府和全社会也必须作出更大的努力,打击在公共场合、媒体和网上发布的极端偏激言论。缅甸正处于历史性的改革开放关键时期,绝不能因为狭隘和偏执而功亏一篑。

仰光/雅加达/布鲁塞尔, 2013年10月1日

Executive Summary

Following the outbreak of deadly intercommunal clashes in Rakhine State in 2012, anti-Muslim violence has spread to other parts of Myanmar. The depth of anti-Muslim sentiment in the country, and the inadequate response of the security forces, mean that further clashes are likely. Unless there is an effective government response and change in societal attitudes, violence could spread, impacting on Myanmar’s transition as well as its standing in the region and beyond.

The violence has occurred in the context of rising Burman-Buddhist nationalism, and the growing influence of the monk-led “969” movement that preaches intolerance and urges a boycott of Muslim businesses. This is a dangerous combination: considerable pent-up frustration and anger under years of authoritarianism are now being directed towards Muslims by a populist political force that cloaks itself in religious respectability and moral authority.

Anti-Indian and anti-Muslim violence is nothing new in Myanmar. It is rooted in the country’s colonial history and demographics, and the rise of Burman nationalism in that context. Deadly violence has erupted regularly in different parts of the country in the decades since. But the lifting of authoritarian controls and the greater availability of modern communications mean that there is a much greater risk of the violence spreading.

Among the most discriminated against populations in Myanmar is the Muslim community in northern Rakhine State, the Rohingya. Most are denied citizenship, and face severe restrictions on freedom of movement as well as numerous abusive policies. In June and October 2012, clashes between Buddhists and Muslims in Rakhine State left almost 200 people dead and around 140,000 displaced, the great majority of them Muslims. Communities remain essentially segregated to this day, and the humanitarian situation is dire.

In early 2013, the violence spread to central Myanmar. The worst incident occurred in the town of Meiktila, where a dispute at a shop led to anti-Muslim violence. The brutal killing of a Buddhist monk sharply escalated the situation, with two days of riots by a 1,000-strong mob resulting in widespread destruction of Muslim neighbourhoods, and leaving at least 44 people dead, including twenty students and several teachers massacred at an Islamic school.

There has been strong domestic and international criticism of the police response. In Rakhine State, the police – who are overwhelmingly made up of Rakhine Buddhists – reportedly had little ability to stop the attacks, and there are allegations of some being complicit in the violence. The army, once it was deployed, performed better. In Meiktila, the police were apparently incapable of controlling the angry crowds that gathered outside the shop, and were hopelessly outnumbered and ineffective when the clashes rapidly escalated.

The violence has regional implications. There has been a sharp increase in the number of Muslims making the treacherous journey by boat from Rakhine State to other countries in the region, prompting public criticism from some of those countries. The intercommunal tensions have also spilled over Myanmar’s borders, with the murders of Myanmar Buddhists in Malaysia, and related violence in other countries. There have also been threats of jihad against Myanmar, and plots and attacks against Myanmar or Buddhist targets in the region. As Myanmar prepares to take over the rotating chairmanship of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in 2014, this could become a serious political issue.

The Myanmar government understands what is at stake. President Thein Sein has spoken publicly on the dangers of the violence, and announced a “zero-tolerance” approach. The police response has been improving somewhat, with faster and more effective interventions bringing incidents under control more quickly. And after some delay, perpetrators of these crimes are being prosecuted and imprisoned, although there are concerns that Buddhists sometimes appear to be treated more leniently.

But much more needs to be done. Beyond improved riot-control training and equipment for police, broader reform of the police service is necessary so that it can be more effective and trusted, particularly at the community level, including officers from ethnic and religious minorities. This is only just starting. The government and society at large must also do more to combat extremist rhetoric, in public, in the media and on­line. At a moment of historic reform and opening, Myanmar cannot afford to become hostage to intolerance and bigotry.

Yangon/Jakarta/Brussels, 1 October 2013

Subscribe to Crisis Group’s Email Updates

Receive the best source of conflict analysis right in your inbox.